German monks developed an easy to ship powdered beer. It’s environmentally friendly but at least for now, non-alcoholic.
2. You get a pesky itch but your skin looks perfectly normal. Why? Bacteria overgrowth may cause itching. A new study discovered Staphylococcus aureus can activate itch enzymes without causing inflammation.
3. On a more serious note, a Sickle cell treatment has FDA approval. The Sickle Cell mutation affects hemoglobin and the blood’s ability to carry blood. It’s a painful, debilitating condition that shows up in adulthood. The new therapy is a gene editing technique and reverts red blood cells to their adolescent form. There is a catch for females. The treatment destroys egg cells and causes infertility.
When I was a shiny new scientist, I worked for a company. It was my dream job, or so I thought. It was a place where scientists were proud to work. But a new company leader wanted something different. He wanted to be able to say he did something new. Projects that could have made plenty of money were cut, research was halted, people were laid off, and incentives were offered for resigning. The older scientists weren’t ready to retire. They had kids in college and getting married. They weren’t 65 and couldn’t go on Medicare. They needed a job. I applied to resign but was turned down. I was too young. They only wanted to get rid of the older people. I saw my future there. It wasn’t secure. I had no real research project and nothing to focus on. I did have a new baby. What nightmare! I left to be a professor, a job that offered tenure, which I got. The company never was as innovative as it had been. Ironically, a person responsible for the short-sighted cuts in new products went on to be an “expert” in “education reform.’“
The US has so many small, private colleges in part because they were seen as a way to make your town in the middle of nowhere seem smart and cultural. Many of these small schools catered to the middle class and their students, being not too rigorous and having plenty of sports and things like fraternities. Those who found education to their liking and wanted more challenge could always go on the graduate school. Believe it or not, this proved very successful to the United States. Colleges were expanded and well-funded in 1958 as part of National Defense following the launch of Sputnik. (That link leads to a great essay on the dismantling of higher education funding and the motivation behind it.) The United States was on a roll. Even students who only wanted to go to college for sports and “mating opportunities'” were nurtured and went on to help make the U.S. an intellectual powerhouse. It was patriotic to be smart, informed, and a college supporter. You didn’t have to have a college education to be these things. You could attend college events.
This autonomy, driven by the professors, resulted in world class research. The US has more Nobel prizes than any other country and is home to over half of the world’s top educational institutions.
Tenure gives the professors the autonomy they need to be both secure and creative. It helped grow the college and university system. It remains a benefit to attract and retain the best faculty. It creates people with a vested interest in their college and the quality of the education it offers. In general, good students become professors and the notion that they would “slack off” because of tenure shows a lack of understanding of teaching and of being a motivated learner.
Tenure creates stability, even in unstable times. Tenure is a benefit and with the benefit, comes cost savings for the college. Nearly every tenure track job pays less than what the person would earn in a non-academic job. I personally took half the salary of my industry job to seek a tenure stable life where I could do my research without having a higher up decide I needed to move on to something new. Being able to follow my own curiosity and that of my students was part of my “pay.”
A perk of tenure is being able to see a research or creative project through.
Freedom to do my own research and have the stability of tenure came with a move to higher education.
“I have come to believe that a great teacher is a great artist … Teaching might even be the greatest of the arts since the medium is the human mind and spirit.” —John Steinbeck
For a post with more photos, click the link above.
A while back I got a question about soap. Specifically, what kind is best in hard water so as not to leave a scum? A quick reading said glycerin soap, but it seemed easy enough to test. I set up my own experiment with regular soap, glycerin soap, vegetable soap with goat milk, and body wash. I placed a half tablespoon of each into separate glasses and then added ¼ cup of mineral water to each. The mineral water contained 345 ppm calcium and 100 ppm magnesium. This gave a total hardness of 445 ppm, considered very hard. Minerals in water react with soaps to form scum.
The pH of the water was 8.4 which is alkaline.
Ten minutes in: differences are noticeable.
To make soap you need to mix fat and an alkali, usually lye.
Different types of soaps may have different fats in the kettle so to speak. In the case of my experiment, the “regular soap” was made from a combination of tallow, palm oils and many other things including glycerin, which is a by-product of soap making.
The goat milk soap was made from olive oil, castor oil coconut, and palm oils in goat milk. Castile soap may also be made from olive oil but isn’t always 100% olive oil. Check the label.
Glycerin soap has glycerol for its fat. Glycerol is a smaller molecule than the other fats and is related to “triglycerides.”
Here’s a list of fats used in soap making for those interested.
Body wash works the same as soap but it isn’t made from fat and lye. It’s derived from oil, palm or coconut usually, and is chemically modified. Since it is sold as a liquid, body wash can have added moisturizers and be pH adjusted. However, bar soap is more compact and has less plastic waste. There really is no best product.You need to use what works for you. If what works for you is the one that leaves the least scum, read on!
I let the soaps sit for five hours.
I filtered each glass. I was going to compare the amount of soap retrieved from each glass but the glycerin soap had fully dissolved. I let the glasses dry for three hours and then took a photo of each.
Here is the regular, conventional soap (Irish Spring) with the remaining soap returned to its divot. You can see the familiar soap scum ring.
Here is the glycerin bar. It has a filmy layer of deposit.
Next is the goat milk Zum Bar (above). The plant-based soap left a deposit.
The body wash left a sludge.
My next step was to clean each glass. Getting rid of soap scum means making it soluble. I added a ¼ cup of water to each glass, swirled it around, and let it sit for the length of a shower, 10 minutes. The water had a pH of 8 and a hardness of 100 (low). I tested the pH of the water and scum. Only the body wash had an acidic pH of 6.8. Your skin likes the pH to be around 5.5 and no higher than 8, which means the body wash has a slight win on this one. The glycerin soap had a pH of 7.4 (7 is neutral) and the other two soaps had a pH of 8.
I let each glass dry.
Here they are (below) in my sunny window. The traditional soaps still have their soap scum with the Irish Spring “regular” soap having the most visible ring. The body wash still looks very slimy.
Next, I added a half of a cup of vinegar to each glass and let it sit for ten minutes. Following this, I rinsed with water and gave each a perfunctory scrub with a brush, trying to clean the crusty spots but not going overboard, because who wants to spend countless minutes scrubbing soap scum? The conventional soap and glycerin soap seemed easiest to clean. Here are the results:
For the last test, I squirted each glass with bathroom cleaner which said it removed 100% of soap scum. Each glass got two squirts and sat for ten minutes. The body wash obliterated the scrubbing bubbles.
Next, I added a half cup of water and let it sit for ten minutes. After that, I scrubbed the glasses and rinsed them. Here are the results, with a little bit of glass sparkle tossed in.
The “regular soap” still had some residue.
The glycerin soap had a little scum near the top but much of the glass was sparkling clean.
The goat milk soap had some scum.
The body wash had some residue.
For the last step, I rinsed all glasses in the dishwasher (without soap but with a rinse aid) for 20 minutes.
They all came out looking clean.
If I study the photos, I’d have to agree that the glycerin soap left the least scum and the conventional soaps the most. However, soap scum is inevitable. My advice would be to keep your bar soap as dry as you can between usage because it will dissolve, especially glycerin, and as it dissolves, scum will form.
This experiment wasn’t quantitative enough to make me fully happy with it. I’d considered weighing the glasses before and after scumming them, but I don’t think the conventional kitchen scales would have caught the differences. Plus, glass can attract water from the air so I would have had to dry them in the oven before and after to get a proper weight. If I had a lab, I’d do this. Or if you have a lab, you can try it.
For those still curious about soap scum and soap, keeping reading.
Remember the old chemist adage, like dissolves like? A soap molecule can go both ways. It has a long greasy tail and a charged head. Think of it as organic and inorganic combined. The head helps the molecule dissolve in water and the tail lifts away the grease and grime from your skin. (illustration here). But here lies the scum problem.
Soap scum was discussed in a long scholarly article.
Itsadanont, Sawwalak, et al. “Dissolution of Soap Scum by Surfactant Part I: Effects of Chelant and Type of Soap Scum.”Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, vol. 17, no. 5, 2014, pp. 849-857
It forms when the calcium and magnesium in the water—the minerals that make the water hard–make a complex with the soap’s charged head. They are charged, they are ions, and they hook up with the charged head of the soap molecule and make it less attracted to the water because the head now has them to hang with. The attraction is undeniable!
This can be prevented by water softening, which removes calcium and magnesium ions and replaces them with sodium ions. Sodium ions don’t hang on so tightly. They like to stay in the water. They won’t make insoluble scum. But soft water is high sodium and low mineral. You really don’t want to be drinking high sodium-low mineral water, so a softner for just the shower would be the key to using this tactic.
Soap scum can be cleaned with vinegar or other pH lowering product, with a surfactant (a cleaning agent), or with a chelating agent. Chelating agents work by stealing away the calcium and magnesium from the scum. However, they only work well at a high pH and this isn’t useful for household products.
In the 90s there was a flurry of products released to keep soap scum from forming and sticking to showers and tubs. They didn’t work great, the interest died down ,and nothing new seems to be forthcoming. I did learn that ants will eat soap scum!
Machosky, Michael. “Keep tiny pests from becoming space invaders.” Tribune – Review / Pittsburgh Tribune – Review, Jun 10, 2006.
If I was being a prudent scientist, I’d repeat the experiment. But this scummy tale is getting long enough! Perhaps everyone reading can try a similar experiment and report back.
This blog was in response to a reader’s question about soap scum and hard water. Thanks for asking!
The old chemist adage goes like this, “Store organics in glass and inorganics in plastic.” Will following this advice make you more healthy? Perhaps, because it applies to your food and drinks.
Organics are materials with carbon bonds and this category would include nearly all foods and other consumables. You may have heard the phrase opposites attract but when it comes to organic chemicals, chemists say “like dissolves like.”
Therefore, most foods really should be stored in glass. Glass will have less interaction with food and beverages. What kind of interactions are we talking about? Here’s an example of what happened when a student put the vitamin riboflavin into plastic flasks. Riboflavin, Vitamin B2, has an orange color that tells the tale. You can see it was highly attracted to the plastic. Plastic used incorrectly can mess up science experiments.
But what about the other scenario? Will plastic stick to things stored in it? Scientists have been on the job, answering this question.
Setting a plastic bottle in the sun and then drinking from it is a recipe for a high source of microplastics. Unfortunately, even foods considered healthy such as seafoods are high plastic level foods as the ocean is utterly contaminated with plastic.
The big question is, “So what? Are these particles causing any health problems?”
Studies indicate, yes. For one thing, they alter the digestive systems of animals across the globe. Seabirds for example, when exposed to plastic laden foods, had fewer commensal bacteria, which help the birds digest their food and recover the nutrients in the food. Even worse, the birds had more harmful bacteria in their digestive tracts when they had eaten microplastics.
Here’s the question: what am I, a chemist, going to do about it? Staring at the bare minimum, I’m going to:
Think small when it comes to foods that are used repeatedly and stored in plastic such as condiments. It’s a well-known chemist rule to get the smallest bottle of a chemical you can reasonably use up and not the jumbo economy size. A big bottle sitting on a shelf or in the refrigerator can easily collect contaminants.
Stick with stainless water and food bowls for my dog. As an aside, on my last post, people responded with comments about washing a pet bowl to keep pink slime away. Bacteria love plastic. Another reason to avoid it for food storage and serving.
Use metal and/or glass for making my coffee and no plastic cups. No Styrofoam! Paper is much safer for to go cups, as long as it doesn’t include a plastic lining.
Avoid high fat foods and milk products stored in plastic. Maybe I’ll go back to making my own yogurt.
Retire my bedside plastic water glass.
Synthetic plastics have been around since 1907. The first plastic bottle was used in 1973. There’s a lot that can be said for their affordability and flexibility. When it comes to food storage and preparations, other options are better.
This post is a response to a question asked by a reader. Thanks for asking!
My novel comes out Tuesday and I’ve spent the month writing about writing. A friend and I were talking about barriers to writing a novel, one being the obligatory sex scene important for certain genres. It’s difficult. It’s touchy. What people want to read is what generates emotions but too much or too little spice will put some people off. People will think it’s autobiographical and putting a novel spin on it (my go-to sexy move) can make it comic. Personally, I worry people will find me a pervert, something people in my home town tend to do.
I gave a half-baked solution to the love-scene dilemma: let ChatGPT do it for you.
For those unfamiliar, ChatGPT is much like a search engine that harvests snippets of text and puts them together into a document. Much of AI does what people do naturally, look for patterns and build on mistakes and correct. But the power of computing allows for it to be done much faster.
The program looks for relevant information on-line and steals it, or maybe harvests it. The problem is, there’s not much check for reliability. In fact, currently, there is none. Thus, according to Scientific American, writing programs have a flaw in that “they are quite prone to hallucination, to saying things that sound plausible and authoritative but simply aren’t so. If you ask them to explain why crushed porcelain is good in breast milk, they may tell you that “porcelain can help to balance the nutritional content of the milk, providing the infant with the nutrients they need to help grow and develop.”
In other words, a writing could be used to write a politician’s speech, especially an evil one. Most definitely politicians are using the writing tool. But love scenes? What does it have to offer?
Here is a love scene written by the now much discussed ChatGPT.
“In a dimly lit room, the air was charged with anticipation as two lovers found themselves entwined in a passionate embrace. Their bodies moved together as if choreographed, their hearts beating in sync with the rhythm of their desire.
As soft music played in the background, their lips met in a tender, lingering kiss. Their hands explored each other’s bodies, tracing delicate paths of pleasure. The gentle touch of fingertips ignited a fire within them, causing their breath to quicken and their bodies to ache for more.
He gently laid her down on the bed, the softness of the sheets caressing her skin. Their eyes locked, a silent promise passing between them. Slowly, he began to undress her, revealing her curves, her vulnerability, and her raw beauty.
Their bodies pressed against each other, skin against skin, as they lost themselves in the moment. Every touch, every caress, sent waves of pleasure through their bodies, building the intensity of their connection.
She arched her back, surrendering to the pleasure that consumed her. His lips trailed down her neck, leaving a trail of hot kisses that sent shivers down her spine. Their bodies moved as one, a symphony of desire and ecstasy.
Time seemed to stand still as they reached new heights of pleasure together, their bodies moving in perfect harmony. Their moans mingled in the air, a symphony of passion that echoed through the room.
As their bodies trembled in the aftermath of their love, they held each other close, their hearts racing with a newfound intimacy. In that moment, they knew they had experienced a love so profound, it transcended the physical, leaving them forever changed.
Note: It is important to remember that consent, communication, and respect are crucial in any intimate encounter. This fictional scene is meant to evoke emotions and connection, but it is essential to prioritize the well-being and comfort of all individuals involved.”
I’ve been given tips to improve my love scene which always includes
1. Slow down
2. Add dialogue
3. Use mature language.
None of that is in the sample love scene generated by ChatGPT.
There are plenty of other programs you can check out to write your next book or part of it and they give sample fiction. What I see when I look them over are an abundance of over-used gestures publishers often say to avoid such as smirking, shrugging, nodding, and raising an eyebrow. Which brings up the problem with AI—it’s not original. It’s good at reviewing and collecting information quickly.
People tend to like the familiar. Did you enjoy the generated love scene? It’s comfortable. It’s safe. And for those a little embarrassed to write a love scene, you could use AI and not have to write it at all. On the other hand, there’s a reason these tools are losing steam in content creation.
My love scenes have been called everything from steamy to lack-luster to wholesome. I have a rom-com style with a little science tossed in.
Here’s an example of my pillow talk from Mixed In.
“How illegal are these condoms?”
He licked his lips. “We don’t have to go all the way. We can take it slow or I can leave.”
“Really illegal, in other words.” What a fool I was to have this man here. He’d pulled me into a dangerous movie theater, yet I was getting ready to sleep with him and use an illegal condom.
“There’s lots that’s banned here. Ever notice that there aren’t bookstores? No art on the walls that doesn’t connect with agriculture? Those things are criminal too.”
His eyes were smoldering. I tried not to let the ache in my genitals or the loneliness in my heart or the rush of adrenaline from the gun-toting Washers speak for me. How could one side of me be so rational and another side of me do stuff like this?
“Why do you sell them if it’s banned?”
“They weren’t always illegal. Everything here fell apart slowly. First, a governor was elected who was in the pocket of the Cochtons. They had the money to make him look like a saint. Before long all we had for an economic base was agriculture. It’s not as if agriculture is bad. People need to eat.”
“Yes. Those beans I’m studying grow on marginal land.” How dumb of me to bring up work at this moment.
“See. The basic premise is good enough. It’s been taken too far. Monoculture of thought.”
“Like expecting a science girl to stick to the lab and not want kids or a family. You know, having a family and caring about someone other than yourself can bring inspiration. Pasteur lost three children to typhus. It inspired him to study infectious disease.” I’d done it now. I’d used typhus as foreplay. Talk about a mood killer.
The type of love scene you want to read and write is as individual as you are. Or maybe not original at all if you want it computer generated.
If you want something with a dash of monster love, Snakes in the Class is a quick read and an insightful look at college and monster life.
Since I’ve written a novel about a college for monsters in a small town, I had to address some of these challenges and consider the causes. I found some things that surprised me. For example, this is a highly partisan issue. Republicans blame colleges and Democrats wish to make more money available to keep costs down. This is what my research taught me:
College costs have been rising rapidly since the 1980s. Here’s a chart showing this rise. What happened in the 1980s? Reaganomics. Reaganomics is an unproven economic theory which is pretty much the boat that Republicans cling to even today–cutting taxes, especially at the top, and shifting spending to the military will stimulate growth in all areas. Thus, government support for education came crashing down, and falls down whenever Republicans are in charge of the budget. I’ll leave it up to you to decide if this policy works for the nation or not. All I can say is that this is when it all began.
The costs per student have risen over time, even as student-faculty ratios have decreased, meaning that faculty salaries can’t be the cause of rising college costs. Here are some references, although you will have to wade through them. However, let’s look at personnel as a cost factor for a moment. As Central College President Mark Putnam points out, colleges are “professional services.” They require on face to face contact with educated and sought after professionals. Doctors, dentists, and lawyers are other examples of such professionals. These sectors of our economy can’t increase productivity without decreasing quality. They can’t replace workers with robots or outsource to another area of the globe and retain the same quality of service. Yes, there are on-line colleges but they aren’t as valuable as being on campus in classrooms, doing hands-on things such as research with professors. I’ve created many do it at home labs but these are not as technology rich as on campus experiences.
In fact, faculty salaries are NOT the main reason for tuition increases. Not only have faculty salaries risen slowly, slower than inflation, they account for around thirty cents of every tuition dollar. Also, college and university faculty get paid less than their private sector counterparts. Professors are considered underpaid. Why do they still teach? Besides finding it enjoyable and a public good, they are willing to take less salary in order to have job security. This is why getting rid of tuition is a dumb idea. It will increase costs and reduce stability.
Like other areas of the private sector, colleges are faced with rising medical and dental benefits for their full-time staff. However, instruction quality increases when faculty have adequate benefits.
Extra administration has often been cited for the increase in college costs. Non-teaching staff and administration make up the bulk of a college’s cost nowadays. That’s right. It’s not the teaches! Some of these positions, in IT for example, did not exist in the days of low tuition. Others are in areas such as counseling and fund raising that either meet a need or secure funds for the future. More administration is most certainly is a reason for higher costs. However, colleges have a lot of extra accountability these days and parents do want their students to have access to many of these services. In fact, studies have shown that college students today are more needy, perhaps due to helicopter parenting or life’s harsh realities or even parental demands that colleges assist the students with every challenge. Students and parents do not want any surprises. In my own experience, not only have administrative costs risen, what needs to be put on a syllabus has skyrocketed as well. I suspect that much of this comes from the diverse group of students who attend college. No longer is it just for the privileged few who have parents who went to college and can give advice. It’s been, thankfully, opened to many and administrators and advisers are needed to keep pace with the demands. Still, I can’t help cringing when my alma matter adds another administrative or marketing position.
Colleges face huge costs when it comes to technology. I personally oversaw a fleet of measuring instruments. Many were not commonly used when I began teaching and now are so routine that every lab must have one in order to teach students the skills they need for the future. I got outside grants to pay for them but they still add expense as they must be maintained. Having a high technology program on campus such as an engineering or medical college also raises costs.
This was once the science building at Central College but it’s way too small for all the equipment and technology that go with science these days. It’s the happy home for English and History now.
Colleges get about half of the money it takes to run them from tuition. Even as tuition is rising, it doesn’t pay the full cost of educating students. Other sources of money to pay for college include private donations, government money, and grants from private and government sources. Personal giving has helped keep colleges and universities affordable.
A few reasons floated for the tuition increases include cushy dorms, multiple sports, and other attempts at branding. There is a joke going around about how often colleges pay for “re-branding” and new logos. This occurred in the past ten-fifteen years as colleges struggled to differentiate themselves from each other.
Another idea is that costs have gone up because there is too much demand for college. Those who can’t afford it simply shouldn’t go. College costs rose after the GI bill so there might be some credibility to it. Yet, it doesn’t hold up because at least in Iowa, we have fewer students going to college and less demand.
Perhaps the most cited reason for tuition increase is this one: politicians. Less support from the government has helped raise tuition costs. Tuition is lower in states that support higher education. Here in Iowa, the change in state appropriation for higher education has decreased nearly 20% over the past fifteen years while college tuition has gone up just 7%. Colleges are trying to hold the line on tuition increases and making do with less. This LESS is due to cutbacks. Reaganomics.
Recently in Iowa, some colleges asked for financial help from COVID relief funds. COVID did put a strain on colleges, and it makes sense to spend money to help them. Our governor said NO and sent National Guard troops to the border with some of the money. Elected officials don’t support college and even complain about some majors. I’ve seen numerous memes and articles about certain majors, mostly social science based with Gender Studies topping the filed. But as my students enlightened me, many video games use these principles, and things like black history to enhance the games. And look at the success of the Barbie movies! Gender studies pays off more than the critics let on. In my novel, the college will face challenges from outsiders who want the monsters to prove themselves useful. It’s not lost on me that politicians support STEM, not because knowledge is beautiful and enriching but because they expect it to make money, especially for their donors.
Unemployment rate for college graduates is 2less than for non-degree holders. Yes, some majors will get you a specialized job but there are no useless majors. I repeat, there are no useless majors. It’s a fib. Study what you love.
Only 4% of college graduates live in poverty vs 12% for non-college graduates.
I’m not an expert on college tuition and the rise in costs are complicated. Feel free to disagree with me! For simplicity’s sake, if you are angry about the cost of college and want something to put on a dart board, I offer this official photo of the man who started it all.
There’s a lot of alone time writing novels, so when the words finally come together and the venture becomes a book, authors have more enthusiasm about reaching out to others than a crated puppy. This week, I’m excited to share the cover of Snakes in the Class. This cover is one of the first glimmers of my book connecting with someone else, in this case, the cover artist.
Do covers help connect readers with books? The answer is yes. A cover helps identify the genre and the mood of the book. No author or publisher wants to lead a reader astray or trick them into reading something they aren’t going to like. A cover should say “read me” to the right audience.
What’s new for covers these days? According to my cover artist, things such as symbolism and bright, contrasting colors are in.
To help the cover artist create my cover, I filled out a form discussing my content and the main characters. I went over it with my editor and we looked over some sample covers in highly read and reviewed books.
My novel is about a gorgon professor at a college for monsters. It’s not highbrow, but it touches on some serious topics such as responsibility, censorship, and how people with differences are viewed by society.
My editor reminded me that my book was both funny and whimsical. The cover was going to be an original drawing. Here’s the first draft.
I told the cover artist that the main character, Gormley Grimn, is “a chemistry professor who is a gorgon. Had strawberry blonde hair and her snakes are orange corn snakes.” She’s a chemistry professor because I’ve been one and chemistry is a good problem-solving knowledge base as Gormely finds herself faced with multiple dilemmas. Why corn snakes? In Snakes in the Class, Gormley is reluctant to use her powers , she doesn’t even understand them, so I chose a harmless snake.
The male lead, Ormr Snaakemon, is “an academic dean who is a man on top and a snake on the bottom. From a Pacific Island originally.” My students suggested a snake man.t I wanted someone who didn’t—couldn’t–transform between a man and a snake. I created a snake man stuck in one form, an anti-hero monster surviving in a thankless job. I’ve long been horrified by the nuclear testing on the Pacific Islands. Having a character with parents affected by it was a good way to weave in the misuse of science as a plot point. I also did a fruit fly mutation experiment as a kid which was ever on my mind. Ormr is a mutant snake man, a hybrid more than a scary monster.
My novel isn’t out until the end of August, but I’m excited to share the cover, In fact, I had some goodies made to give away as promotions. I’ll be handing them out to bookstores in hopes of getting on their shelves. Do you know a bookstore that would be interested? Would you like a coaster or a sticker? Let me know.
Sketch of greek mythological Medusa, the woman with snakes on her head
Writing a book is like falling in love. You have high hopes, fears you push aside, and a deep longing to connect, bring joy, and be understood. You’re at your most vulnerable and sometimes you swear you’ll never do it again. But you do.
When my publisher put out a request for monster novels set in college, the professor in me couldn’t resist. Not only was I still in the classroom, my students were reading and writing a lot of monster fiction, with heavy doses of mythology added in. I’d already longed to write about a gorgon main character. I can identify with being cursed, having been a cute child until my gnarly* permanent teeth came in. (*Yes, some of the novel is set in the 80s and 90s.) This was my chance.
I could come up with plenty of college problems. Outsiders make things up about campus life, political types will try to cut funding, and a small school in the boonies might not attract students like it used to.
But what about something to make life as a gorgon worth living? My class told me about man-snakes and that settled it. A campus romance was in the works. The result: Snakes in the Class.
I learned a disturbing piece of history as I wrote this book. I read about the Bacchanalian purge of 186 B.C. In a nutshell, the cult of Dionysus as brought to Southern Italy from Greece, had grown quite popular. The female based cult, more of which can be read here, upset the sexist Roman Senate, which placed restrictions on the members and eventually killed them, but not before portraying them as wild haired baby killers. Oh, and they liked snakes. Nothing new here–many religions appreciate snakes. Not only that, Dionysus was a liberator, a symbol of equality for all in a hierarchical society. His festivals were fun and women could be free of the male dominated society during them.
The Roman Empire was fueled by inequality, which lead it its ultimate downfall. Too bad they wiped out all of the diverse ideas and populations and let the corrupt upper-class call the shots. They even started doing away with polytheism because one male god was so much more like them! The Visigoths came in and finished the job.
Today, if you find yourself surrounded by drab, sexist, snake haters, you have the ancient Romans to thank for it.
The cult of Dionysus was wiped out, although many secretly stuck with their festivals and practices. The Romans were good at stirring up hatred for free thinkers. It was much like what happened to the Cathars.
The two groups, Bacchanalians and Cathars, had little in common, one being freewheeling partiers and the other, pious vegetarians. Other than being extinguished by forces out of Rome, the groups had female equality as an important societal norm.
We see a lot of these same tactics today, often lead by women who have embraced ambivalent sexism—you know, the whole good woman bad woman Madonna vs whore ideal. There have been a slate of hate lawspassed in many states, often sparked by fears of promiscuity, particularly by people who married young and embraced strict gender roles. Women who gave up education to marry are often at the forefront, worried their partners will cheat. Men who feel stuck in society try to gain social status in their own eyes by being self-appointed morality police. It is politically strategic to target these insecure people and to find another group to scapegoat. Traditionally, scapegoats were physically ugly people beaten and driven out of a town to ward off bad luck—monsters of a sort. Thus, creating an unequal society where some feel they’ve had adversity in life is a way to keep the powerful in their cushy positions. It’s not nice, but it works.
This is a long discussion to illustrate the historical and current problems a college for monsters in a small rural town might face, even if the monsters are as well-behaved as they can be. And what could be more frightening than a gorgon professor—educated, female, and deadly?
Despite all of the heavy problems, the novel is funny, even whimsical. It’s for college fans and equality fans and monsters everywhere. If there is anything about you that put snakes on your head, it’s for you!
In any case, here’s my shortened pitch:
Professor Gormley Grimn didn’t choose the Gorgon life—the Gorgon life chose her…sort of. When she was cursed by the jealous fiancée of her study partner, Gormley fled, leaving those she loved behind to become a professor of chemistry at Manster College. It’s a safely secluded life, devoid of sex–until she falls into a lusty affair with Dean Ormr Snaakemon—half smooth-skinned man, half smooth-scaled snake, one hundred percent hottie. Life as a cursed Gorgon finally doesn’t seem so bad. Gormley’s a lover, not a killer.
When the local Purity League vows to stamp out all monsters, she’s pushed to a decision. Should she and her students stick with her no-killing principles, or join forces with the anti-Purity League Knobbers—a group of demigods, including the woman who cursed her? When all you need is love and a college education, does anything make fighting worth it?
Snakes in the Class is a monster romance novel featuring steamy snakes and a touching HEA. It is the first book in the Monster College Chronicles series.
In the next post, I’ll show the cover and talk about how it came to be. (The illustration for today’s post is clip art, not the cover.)
Snakes in the Class will be out this August 29, in time for back to school. I’ll be giving a reading at Beaverdale Books on Sept. 11. I’d love to talk more about it with anyone!
The family recently took a trip to France. We spent most of the time in Provence in the Luberon region, nesting in a villa in the quaint town of Roussillon.
One thing you notice in France is how good it smells! The agriculture here includes melons, herbs, olives, wine, and lavender.
My son took the photos of the lavender fields.
Everywhere you go are flowers and olive trees.
The ochre tinted buildings have colorful doors and shutters.
Roussillon is known for its ochre. You can even tour a mine—not at all rigorous.
The iron rich soil along with limestone and plenty of silica stimulates the growth of many different plants including orchids, chestnuts, pines, heather, and the herbs found in Herbs de Provence.
It’s also got plenty of cute shops and art stores.
No photos allowed at the art stores but the region is also known for fabrics.
Nearby, the beautiful town of Gordes is made of sedimentary rocks and perched on a mountain.
One day, we took a trip to Calenques of Cassis. Click on this link and see the cliff we walked along to get to a beach. No thanks Google maps, for not warning us of the steepness. We lived. No one fell off. I’m not sure how. Somehow this route to Port Pin was not as easy as it’s rumored to be.
This was our reward when we reached our destination. Fortunately, we found a safer path back to our car.
L’Isle-sur-la-Sorgue is a pretty town filled with canals and a lively market. Getting there involved a lot of twists and turns. Some of us (not me, I was a tagalong) rented cars and navigated the massif. Somehow, this area is advertised as good for cycling. I’m not sure about the bicyclists but we in our cars only screamed a few times as we squeezed through the narrow roads, far less than when we drove in Italy.
I wished I had my water testing equipment. I could show the people of Iowa what water can be—so clear and filled with fish.
This says Pierre and Marie Curie Chemin. I thought “chemin” meant lab but really, it’s a street. When in France, try to bring someone along who speaks French. The locals aren’t dying to practice their English, although I found the French merchants very good at upselling.
The merchants are very liberal with samples.
Nougat is made from sugar, honey, and nuts.
Before you know it, you’ll have sampled your way into many euros worth of nougat.
Southern France also has plenty of castles for exploring many built for by the Cathars as they tried, ultimately in vain, to keep religious Crusaders from exterminating them. One of their many beliefs was equality between men and women—very unpopular with the pope! Lesson here—watch out for those religious authoritarians! They’re mean.
Here are some photos from Carcassonne, some of which is now a lively marketplace.
Now I’m back to the land of corn and soybeans. I wish we had some lavender fields or at least better smells. Flowers are where it’s at. Barnswallow Flowers, I’m talking about you!